Heart Diseases: strong vessels - long life

A total lack of supporting evidence does not necessarily prove that saturated fat and fat in the diet does not cause heart disease. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence? Let me move some of the strongest evidence that directly contradict the diet-heart hypothesis. But where to start? There is only so much to choose from.

I think the best place to start is to have made with the largest study ever on dietary modification, and the greatest that will ever happen. Fifty million people were placed on a low saturated fat diet for fourteen years. Sausages, eggs, cheese, bacon and milk were severely restricted. Fruit and fish, but were freely available, the oh-so-healthy foods.

guessed Yes, what I am talking about. Rationing in the United Kingdom during and after the Second World War. But I did not say that prices fell heart disease during the war, this was not used as evidence for the diet-heart hypothesis? Yes, I did say that. But how on earth you could use the information from the ration to support the hypothesis that I am saturated fat is so deadly that even a decline in future consumption to a sharp decline in deaths from heart disease will result in the present ! Evidence that the space-time continuum is less rigid than we think and saturated fatty acids can seep through.

The most interesting facts about the rationing arise are:

1 For: 12 years, saturated fats was severely restricted.

2: increased consumption of fruit and fish.

3 KNOWLEDGE: The proportion of heart disease almost trebled.I, it's a little paradoxical, it isnot? And where are we now of paradoxes, I would like to introduce a few more.

The most famous is the paradox of French paradox.

Laurie has been writing articles for nearly 4 years. Come visit his latest website over at http://headtennisshoes.info/ which helps people find the best Tennis Shoes Deals.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Laura_Hagen